Post by amirmukaddas on Mar 12, 2024 17:25:15 GMT 8
Link building done well is an expensive activity, they say, but sometimes you can do a good job simply by investing time in understanding who to contact and what to propose. free link building Any activity aimed at artificially manipulating the ranking of a website will sooner or later be discovered and penalized by Google. That said, I'm not against link building and I don't think you should get a bad idea about it either. I'll try to explain why. When Google guidelines talk about artificial links , they are referring to links on pages that do not transfer any value to users. If a web page is useless, so will the link from that resource to your website. Useless, at best. Google recommends avoiding link buying and selling , which is why it explicitly requires the nofollow attribute for all links within review articles . In my opinion, however, it is an extreme measure that throws the baby out with the bathwater. Which links always work? These are links coming from trusted resources, even those not relevant to the topic .
Many disagree on this point, but I can say from direct experience that although Google is evolving in the direction of determining trusted content , it is not that it has forgotten about trusted sites , Bruce Clay also Denmark Telegram Number Data says this in the interview he gave me. A trusted site (which then includes trust and TRUST, let's face it) pushes regardless of the topic it deals with. This means that if tomorrow the Apple website put a link to Seogarden on the homepage with the dry anchor "SEO", it is likely that my blog would jump to the front page for the dry key. If it were to carry out a manual check on the Apple website and not find a valid reason why that link should be there, it could take action (probably nullifying its effect). Expensive link building.
In short, "expensive" link building basically coincides with buying links from trust sites , provided that they obviously sell them, since as "trusts", they will not be able to offer links to anyone who has enough money to buy them, without risking a penalty from outgoing link . And it would be a shame, because you don't become a trust source overnight. Link building is expensive even when you want to develop a PBN , i.e. a network of thematic blogs from which to move links to your website. Expensive because you can imagine how many resources are needed to create 5, 10 or I don't doubt that a well-made PBN is a good thing for positioning, I'm just saying that with what it costs, many times you could do other things, improve (a lot) your website of interest, offer a better service... and the links?
Many disagree on this point, but I can say from direct experience that although Google is evolving in the direction of determining trusted content , it is not that it has forgotten about trusted sites , Bruce Clay also Denmark Telegram Number Data says this in the interview he gave me. A trusted site (which then includes trust and TRUST, let's face it) pushes regardless of the topic it deals with. This means that if tomorrow the Apple website put a link to Seogarden on the homepage with the dry anchor "SEO", it is likely that my blog would jump to the front page for the dry key. If it were to carry out a manual check on the Apple website and not find a valid reason why that link should be there, it could take action (probably nullifying its effect). Expensive link building.
In short, "expensive" link building basically coincides with buying links from trust sites , provided that they obviously sell them, since as "trusts", they will not be able to offer links to anyone who has enough money to buy them, without risking a penalty from outgoing link . And it would be a shame, because you don't become a trust source overnight. Link building is expensive even when you want to develop a PBN , i.e. a network of thematic blogs from which to move links to your website. Expensive because you can imagine how many resources are needed to create 5, 10 or I don't doubt that a well-made PBN is a good thing for positioning, I'm just saying that with what it costs, many times you could do other things, improve (a lot) your website of interest, offer a better service... and the links?